The Application of ASTM Standards for Using, Specifying, and Testing Traffic Monitoring Devices (TMDs)

Print
General Information
Study Number: TPF-5(214)
Former Study Number:
Lead Organization: New Mexico Department of Transportation
Solicitation Number: 1210
Partners: AK, ID, NM, OH, PADOT, TN, TX
Status: Study cancelled
Est. Completion Date:
Contract/Other Number:
Last Updated: Aug 26, 2010
Contract End Date:
Financial Summary
Contract Amount: $105,000.00
Suggested Contribution:
Total Commitments Received: $105,000.00
100% SP&R Approval: Approved
Contact Information
Lead Study Contact(s): Deirdre Billingsley
Deirdre.Billingsley@state.nm.us
Phone: 505-841-9147
Organization Year Commitments Technical Contact Name Funding Contact Name
Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities 2009 $20,000.00 Maryann Dierckman Clint Adler
Idaho Department of Transportation 2009 $5,000.00 Amanda Laib
New Mexico Department of Transportation 2009 $0.00 Deirdre Billingsley
Ohio Department of Transportation 2009 $20,000.00 Dave Gardner General Research
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation 2009 $10,000.00 Bonnie Fields
Tennessee Department of Transportation 2009 $35,000.00 Stephanie Vincent
Texas Department of Transportation 2009 $15,000.00 Charlie Farnham Frank Bailey

Study Description

Millions of dollars are spend each year on ITS with little consideration for the quality of the product and for its long term maintenance. The cause of this problem is that there are no criteria for the test results of these devices. State and local agencies purchase specific products to meet their needs without assurances that vendor's performance claims can be met. This then requires agencies to often conduct their own testing, requiring an investment of time and money, or aspects of devices are never tested which results in higher maintenance costs and loss of service. Furthermore, past and current use of traffic monitoring devices has raised several concerns about data quality: - The consequences of the absence of hardware standardization; - The effect of the absence of standard specifications for procurement purposes; - The result of the lack of performance standards and certification procedures; - The usefulness of states sharing test results (should any informal sharing occur) without test standards; - Data inconsistencies and incompatibilities; and - Reliability and quality control problems associated with field equipment and instrumentation. It is believed that National standards would resolve, or reduce the impact of many of these issues. Current guidance such as "Test Methods for Traffic Monitoring Devices" give options instead of actual guidance as to what is reasonable to assume when testing. In reference to Traffic monitoring devices, we refer to devices (and the support structure for devices) measuring vehicle presence, speed, axles, classification, or weight (WIM), for both freeway and arterial operation.

Objectives

The overall goal of this project is to determine the feasibility of a national certification program, and to develop a roadmap.

Scope of Work

Specific objectives include: 1. Identify existing TMD testing facilities and their capabilities and collaborate with them regarding the use of the existing TMD standards for their testing programs. 2. Determine if a national certification program is feasible. 3. Develop a phased plan with contingencies; to create a national certification including potential roadblocks and how those can be overcome.

Comments

For states involved in previous VDC pooled fund studies, this is a continuation of that work which fell short of a national certification program. The goal of this study is to determine what it will take to develop this certification program. We will then follow up with another national study to develop that program based on the results. The standardization of testing will lead to lower costs for state and local agencies involved in testing, and enhanced performance for TMDs. These enhancements will result in less delay, and lower costs.

Documents Attached
Title File/Link Document Category Document Type Privacy Document Date Download
Quarterly Report: January - March 2010 3rd_Quarterly_Report_TMD.pdf Progress Report Quarterly Progress Report Public 2010-04-06
Progress Report No. 4 ¿ July 19, 2010 4thQuarterlyReportTMD.pdf Progress Report Quarterly Progress Report Public 2010-07-28
Quarterly Report: October 2009 quarterly_report_2009-10-13.pdf Progress Report Quarterly Progress Report Public 2009-10-13
Acceptance Memo acceptance_memo.pdf Memorandum Other Public 2009-08-26
Quarterly Report: January 2010 quarterly_report_2010-01-04.pdf Progress Report Quarterly Progress Report Public 2010-02-12
Documents Attached
Title File/Link Document Category Document Type Privacy Document Date Download
The Application of ASTM Standards for Using, Specifying, and Testing Traffic Monitoring Devices (TMDs) 1210.pdf TPF Study Documentation Solicitation Public 2011-09-25

The Application of ASTM Standards for Using, Specifying, and Testing Traffic Monitoring Devices (TMDs)

General Information
Study Number: TPF-5(214)
Lead Organization: New Mexico Department of Transportation
Solicitation Number: 1210
Partners: AK, ID, NM, OH, PADOT, TN, TX
Status: Study cancelled
Est. Completion Date:
Contract/Other Number:
Last Updated: Aug 26, 2010
Contract End Date:
Financial Summary
Contract Amount: $105,000.00
Total Commitments Received: $105,000.00
100% SP&R Approval:
Contact Information
Lead Study Contact(s): Deirdre Billingsley
Deirdre.Billingsley@state.nm.us
Phone: 505-841-9147
Commitments by Organizations
Organization Year Commitments Technical Contact Name Funding Contact Name Contact Number Email Address
Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities 2009 $20,000.00 Maryann Dierckman Clint Adler 907-451-5321 clint.adler@alaska.gov
Idaho Department of Transportation 2009 $5,000.00 Amanda Laib 208-334-8181 amanda.laib@itd.idaho.gov
New Mexico Department of Transportation 2009 $0.00 Deirdre Billingsley 505-841-9147 Deirdre.Billingsley@state.nm.us
Ohio Department of Transportation 2009 $20,000.00 Dave Gardner General Research 614-644-8135 Research@dot.state.oh.us
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation 2009 $10,000.00 Bonnie Fields 717-214-8686 bfields@state.pa.us
Tennessee Department of Transportation 2009 $35,000.00 Stephanie Vincent 615.741.2203 Stephanie.Vincent@tn.gov
Texas Department of Transportation 2009 $15,000.00 Charlie Farnham Frank Bailey 512- 416-4730 rtimain@txdot.gov

Study Description

Study Description

Millions of dollars are spend each year on ITS with little consideration for the quality of the product and for its long term maintenance. The cause of this problem is that there are no criteria for the test results of these devices. State and local agencies purchase specific products to meet their needs without assurances that vendor's performance claims can be met. This then requires agencies to often conduct their own testing, requiring an investment of time and money, or aspects of devices are never tested which results in higher maintenance costs and loss of service. Furthermore, past and current use of traffic monitoring devices has raised several concerns about data quality: - The consequences of the absence of hardware standardization; - The effect of the absence of standard specifications for procurement purposes; - The result of the lack of performance standards and certification procedures; - The usefulness of states sharing test results (should any informal sharing occur) without test standards; - Data inconsistencies and incompatibilities; and - Reliability and quality control problems associated with field equipment and instrumentation. It is believed that National standards would resolve, or reduce the impact of many of these issues. Current guidance such as "Test Methods for Traffic Monitoring Devices" give options instead of actual guidance as to what is reasonable to assume when testing. In reference to Traffic monitoring devices, we refer to devices (and the support structure for devices) measuring vehicle presence, speed, axles, classification, or weight (WIM), for both freeway and arterial operation.

Objectives

The overall goal of this project is to determine the feasibility of a national certification program, and to develop a roadmap.

Scope of Work

Specific objectives include: 1. Identify existing TMD testing facilities and their capabilities and collaborate with them regarding the use of the existing TMD standards for their testing programs. 2. Determine if a national certification program is feasible. 3. Develop a phased plan with contingencies; to create a national certification including potential roadblocks and how those can be overcome.

Comments

For states involved in previous VDC pooled fund studies, this is a continuation of that work which fell short of a national certification program. The goal of this study is to determine what it will take to develop this certification program. We will then follow up with another national study to develop that program based on the results. The standardization of testing will lead to lower costs for state and local agencies involved in testing, and enhanced performance for TMDs. These enhancements will result in less delay, and lower costs.

Title File/Link Type Private
Progress Report No. 4 ¿ July 19, 2010 4thQuarterlyReportTMD.pdf Progress Report Public
Quarterly Report: January - March 2010 3rd_Quarterly_Report_TMD.pdf Progress Report Public
Quarterly Report: January 2010 quarterly_report_2010-01-04.pdf Progress Report Public
Quarterly Report: October 2009 quarterly_report_2009-10-13.pdf Progress Report Public
Acceptance Memo acceptance_memo.pdf Memorandum Public
Title File/Link Type Private
The Application of ASTM Standards for Using, Specifying, and Testing Traffic Monitoring Devices (TMDs) 1210.pdf TPF Study Documentation Public

Currently, Transportation Pooled Fund is not supported on mobile devices, please access this Web portal using a desktop or laptop computer.