Status: This feature/page is currently in Beta Release mode. Bug Report
Solicitation Detail View Print

Developing "Hiqhway Capacity Manual" Capacity Adjustments for Agency Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Operational Planning Readiness under Varying Levels of Volume and Market Penetration

General Information

Solicitation Number: 1447 Status: Cleared by FHWA Date Posted: Apr 24, 2017
Last Updated: Jun 24, 2019 Solicitation Expires: Apr 24, 2018 Partners: AR , CT , FL , IN , MDOT SHA , NC , OR , TX , UT , WA
Lead Agency: Oregon Department of Transportation
Study Number: TPF-5(371)

Contact Information:

Lead Agency Contact:
  Tony Knudson
anthony.h.knudson@odot.state.or.us
Phone: 503-986-2848


Financial Summary:

Commitment Start Year: 2017 Commitment End Year: 2020 100% SP&R Approval: Approved
Commitments Required: $150,000.00 Commitments Received: $310,000.00  


Commitments by Organization:

Agency Year Commitments Funding Contact Name Contact Number Email Address
Arkansas Department of Transportation 2018 $15,000.00 Elisha Wright-Kehner Elisha.Wright-Kehner@ardot.gov
Arkansas Department of Transportation 2019 $15,000.00 Elisha Wright-Kehner Elisha.Wright-Kehner@ardot.gov
Connecticut Department of Transportation 2018 $15,000.00 Edgardo Block 860-594-2495 Edgardo.Block@ct.gov
Connecticut Department of Transportation 2019 $15,000.00 Edgardo Block 860-594-2495 Edgardo.Block@ct.gov
Florida Department of Transportation 2018 $15,000.00 Patti Brannon 850-414-4616 patti.brannon@dot.state.fl.us
Florida Department of Transportation 2019 $15,000.00 Patti Brannon 850-414-4616 patti.brannon@dot.state.fl.us
Indiana Department of Transportation 2018 $15,000.00 Tommy Nantung 765-463-1521 ext 248 tnantung@indot.in.gov
Indiana Department of Transportation 2019 $15,000.00 Tommy Nantung 765-463-1521 ext 248 tnantung@indot.in.gov
Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration 2018 $15,000.00 Allison Hardt 410-545-2916 ahardt@mdot.maryland.gov
Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration 2019 $15,000.00 Allison Hardt 410-545-2916 ahardt@mdot.maryland.gov
North Carolina Department of Transportation 2018 $15,000.00 Neil Mastin 919 707 6661 jmastin@ncdot.gov
North Carolina Department of Transportation 2019 $15,000.00 Neil Mastin 919 707 6661 jmastin@ncdot.gov
Oregon Department of Transportation 2018 $20,000.00 Tony Knudson 503-986-2848 anthony.h.knudson@odot.state.or.us
Oregon Department of Transportation 2019 $20,000.00 Tony Knudson 503-986-2848 anthony.h.knudson@odot.state.or.us
Texas Department of Transportation 2018 $15,000.00 Karrie Boedeker 512-486-5021 karrie.boedeker@txdot.gov
Texas Department of Transportation 2019 $15,000.00 Karrie Boedeker 512-486-5021 karrie.boedeker@txdot.gov
Utah Department of Transportation 2018 $15,000.00 David Stevens 801-589-8340 davidstevens@utah.gov
Utah Department of Transportation 2019 $15,000.00 David Stevens 801-589-8340 davidstevens@utah.gov
Washington State Department of Transportation 2019 $15,000.00 Jon Peterson 360-705-7499 peterjn@wsdot.wa.gov
Washington State Department of Transportation 2020 $15,000.00 Jon Peterson 360-705-7499 peterjn@wsdot.wa.gov


Study Description

Background:
The capability of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAV) is progressing at a faster rate with particular focus on technological performance, and its wide-ranging potential impacts on safety, operation, and regulatory issues. For example, CAVs could travel closer together at smaller headway which enables higher capacity through existing infrastructure. Existing CAV research is often limited in terms of scope, scale, approach, or underlying assumptions, and has not sufficiently addressed questions about the large-scale impacts of CAV on highway capacity, which are required by decision-makers to inform policies.

Moreover, the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) is at risk of becoming outdated or limited in relevance/usefulness as the CAV technologies become more prevalent on the market. The current HCM has multiple limitations regarding CAV analysis including:

(1) Capacity-related HCM methods cannot be used to evaluate projects or facilities that would utilize CAV technology,
as the impacts of CAV strategies are not accounted for.

(2) Lack of existing analysis guidance regarding the suitability of the HCM for analyses involving CAV strategies.

(3) Limited consideration of market penetration and the effects they will have on the realized outcomes associated with
CAV technologies on various facilities.

These limitations drive a critical need to develop HCM capacity adjustments (CCAV) to be prepared for future CAV operations under varying levels of volume and market penetration.
Objectives:
The research objectives of this project are to develop the highway capacity adjustments for CAVs at different levels of volume and market penetration in order to adapt the use of HCM in analyzing CAV applications. The major highlight of this project is the project team working closely with Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) through an iteratively updating and revising process.

The major approach for this problem is through a scenario simulation planning framework and through simulation tools in which the CAV and non-CAV behavior are coded differently. The interactions among and beyond CAVs and non-CAVs are specified in details in the simulation scenarios. It is important to note that this research intends to focus on CAV and not Connected Vehicles (CV) nor Autonomous Vehicles (AV). This is because CV and AV on their own are not anticipated to greatly impact highway capacity. Significant capacity gains are only anticipated when both vehicles are automated (driven by computer) and connected (computer driven vehicles coordinating and optimizing with one another).

This project plans on testing market penetration at varying levels of volumes to see how market penetration impacts both throughput (maximum pre-breakdown flow rate) and recovery time after congestion subsides (breakdown flow rate and maximum discharge flow rate) under various conditions. This research also attempts to measure how incidents (crashes) and events (weather, local surges in entering or exiting volume) impact throughput and recovery time at varying levels of volume and market penetration.

The expected products of this research are highway capacity adjustment lookup tables and figures for different facilities
(freeway, arterials) at different levels of CAV market penetration. This project is designed to address the limitations identified with respect to the CAV effects in HCM analysis procedures. It is anticipated that the project team and the project TAC will work closely regarding the iterative nature of assumptions and results associated with the defined scenarios to ensure the usefulness of the project products for agency operational and planning readiness. The project team is also expected to be receptive to relevant research elsewhere and what new CAV advancements could possibly emerge over the project period.

This project will benefit public agencies to accommodate highway capacity related analysis under the impacts of CAV for different levels of volumes and market penetrations. Specifically, it will inform agencies about how CAV market
penetration will affect capacity leading to better informed investment decisions in area freeways, new roundabouts and signals, and safety projects.This research will also put the HCM at the forefront of CAV research in terms of operational readiness of CAV applications and technologies.
Scope of Work:
The project team and TAC will work together closely through an iterative process to achieve the following specific research tasks, and estimated costs and duration to be undertaken by the researchers for the study:

Task 1: Literature Review and CAV Analysis Gaps. A focused review of the operational impacts of CAV will be conducted under Task 1, in particular on the operational impacts on highway capacity. This review will systematically assess what has been done in terms of modeling scenarios, parameters, tools, and methodologies. The purpose of this review is to create an initial set of knowledge to inform the modeling work in this project. Stage 1: A literature review will be built and then reviewed by the TAC. Stage 2: Feedback from the TAC will be used to update literature review and project objectives, which will then be shared with other agencies.

Task 2: Scenario Identification and Test Prioritization. Suggestions from the TAC and feedback from task 1 will be used to identify the CAV modeling scenarios and their applications based on the HCM, for example, the impacts on link or junction capacity, capacity at merging or diverging, or capacity of different facility types. List and prioritize scenarios for different road configurations with identifying the market penetration rates and traffic volume. List and justify the assumptions for each test.

Task 3: Model Framework: the Impacts of CAV on Highway Capacity (HC). Following the assumptions defined by TAC, capacity gains and operational outcomes associated with individual CAV applications will be modeled and analyzed to all scenarios within the research, as functions of market penetration rate, roadway characteristics/configuration (e.g., mixed-flow lanes or dedicated lanes for CV traffic), traffic characteristics, and the design parameters being used by automobile OEMs (e.g., following distances and headway). Capacity gain for each combination of capability and market penetration will be compared to the base no-build situation (no CAVs) based on HCM. The project team will prepare a presentation of framework to the TAC and update models based on feedback. An interim presentation including project status, process, and feedback from various committees will also be prepared for TAC members to present in TRB mid-year and annual meeting.

Task 4: Monthly Testing and Reporting for TAC Review and Publication. The project team will accomplish the prioritized testing from task 2 and prepare a monthly memo for the TAC to review and approve from Month 6 to 12 including (1) approved testing scenarios, (2) issues raised and how they are resolved, and (3) findings/results of testing. Modifying the strategy-specific models of CAV-related capacity and operational impacts from Task 2 to make them compatible with current HCM methods, assumptions, inputs, and outputs. The TAC will review findings and revise prioritized testing list and operation assumptions. An integrated interim report and presentation will be prepared for TRB meeting and online publication.

Task 5: Create the HCM Adjustments Lookup Tables and Figures. Developing an analysis
framework/methodology for accurately capturing the effects/outcomes of CAV applications in the HCM and other tools, which would include recommended approaches, best practices, and known limitations, and would promote consistency among analysts. Also, identifying the limitations of the HCM and discussing where it fits in an overall CAV analysis
toolbox/framework.

Task 6: Draft Preliminary Final Report. The project team will prepare and submit a preliminary draft final report documenting the research study, conclusions, and recommendations. Besides, 2-3 application examples for each facility will be included to demonstrate how the adjustments in HCM can be used in a planning process.

Task 7: Final Report and Delivery. Incorporation of final feedback from the TAC and production of a final
report.
Comments:
For full partner benefits, a 2-year funding commitment; $15K/yr (paid annually) assuming 5 agencies join the fund, with potential discounts for in kind contributions if necessary for participation.

Project TAC will determine statement of work and selection criteria.

2-yr road map developed/approved by TAC; non-consensus decided by majority rule.


Documents:

TitleTypePrivate
FHWA Waiver of non-Federal Funding Match for SPR Funds Approval Letter Memorandum N
Arkansas Highway Commission minute order approving participation in pooled fund study Other N
 
back to top