Financial Summary |
|
Contract Amount: | |
Suggested Contribution: | |
Total Commitments Received: | $420,000.00 |
100% SP&R Approval: | Approved |
Contact Information |
|||
Lead Study Contact(s): | Mustansir Kadibhai | ||
makadibhai@ncdot.gov | |||
Phone: 919 707 6667 | |||
FHWA Technical Liaison(s): | Justin Ocel | ||
justin.ocel@dot.gov | |||
Phone: 202- 281-8213 | |||
Study Champion(s): | Brian Hanks | ||
bhanks@ncdot.gov | |||
Phone: 919-707-6419 |
Organization | Year | Commitments | Technical Contact Name | Funding Contact Name |
---|---|---|---|---|
Delaware Department of Transportation | 2022 | $40,000.00 | Kevin Lindell | Charlanne Clymer |
Delaware Department of Transportation | 2023 | $20,000.00 | Kevin Lindell | Charlanne Clymer |
Georgia Department of Transportation | 2022 | $20,000.00 | Peter Wu | Brennan Roney |
Georgia Department of Transportation | 2023 | $20,000.00 | Peter Wu | Brennan Roney |
Georgia Department of Transportation | 2024 | $20,000.00 | Peter Wu | Brennan Roney |
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development | 2021 | $20,000.00 | Kurt Brauner | Tyson Rupnow |
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development | 2022 | $20,000.00 | Kurt Brauner | Tyson Rupnow |
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development | 2023 | $20,000.00 | Kurt Brauner | Tyson Rupnow |
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development | 2024 | $0.00 | Kurt Brauner | Tyson Rupnow |
New York State Department of Transportation | 2021 | $0.00 | Jeffery Ward | Gail Carpenter |
New York State Department of Transportation | 2022 | $40,000.00 | Jeffery Ward | Gail Carpenter |
New York State Department of Transportation | 2023 | $20,000.00 | Jeffery Ward | Gail Carpenter |
North Carolina Department of Transportation | 2021 | $0.00 | Trey Carroll | Mustansir Kadibhai |
North Carolina Department of Transportation | 2022 | $20,000.00 | Trey Carroll | Mustansir Kadibhai |
North Carolina Department of Transportation | 2023 | $20,000.00 | Trey Carroll | Mustansir Kadibhai |
North Carolina Department of Transportation | 2024 | $20,000.00 | Trey Carroll | Mustansir Kadibhai |
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation | 2021 | $20,000.00 | Joshua Charnosky | Evan Zeiders |
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation | 2022 | $20,000.00 | Joshua Charnosky | Evan Zeiders |
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation | 2023 | $20,000.00 | Joshua Charnosky | Evan Zeiders |
Tennessee Department of Transportation | 2021 | $20,000.00 | Rick Crawford | Stacy Carter |
Tennessee Department of Transportation | 2022 | $20,000.00 | Rick Crawford | Stacy Carter |
Tennessee Department of Transportation | 2023 | $20,000.00 | Rick Crawford | Stacy Carter |
The corrosion of steel bridges is an ongoing concern for bridge owners due to maintenance and replacement costs. Recently, there have been successful corrosion resistance tests performed on ASTM A709 Grade 50CR (stainless) steel in plate girder bridges. Before stainless steel’s adoption into ASTM A709 the steel was marketed under ASTM A1010 and has currently been used in 5 states (OR, CA, IA, PA, VA) and Canada. Utilizing stainless steel (Grade 50CR) for the portion of the steel girder near bridge deck joints and Grade 50, 50W, etc. for the remainder of the girder, provides a means to mitigate deterioration in areas exposed to run-off from failed deck joints. Targeting the use of Grade 50CR to portions of the bridge requires bolting or welding stainless steel to conventional steel. The dual grade plate girder created by connecting stainless steel to conventional steel provides a reduction in the life cycle maintenance costs and increases the service life of the steel plate girder bridge. However, the connection of the dual grade plates may be prone to galvanic corrosion or require fabrication processes that differ from conventional plate girder fabrication processes. To take advantage of the corrosion resistant cost savings of a dual grade girder, research is needed to address the galvanic corrosion and fabrication of the dual grade connection.
The objective of this research is to examine the feasibility of connecting bridge-construction approved ASTM stainless steel (currently only Grade 50CR is approved) to conventional steel (Grade 36, 50, 50W, etc.) through welding or bolting and to develop guidelines to assist designers and fabricators when connecting stainless steel plates to conventional steel plates in the superstructure of highway bridges. The guidelines would be considered a supplemental document to the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications.
The proposed project is focused on the design details, fabrication, and performance of dual grade steel girders. The project’s work plan is divided into three main research tasks. Task 1 – Literature Review - 3 Months ($50,000) Conduct a current literature review of sources that have published mechanical and corrosion properties of stainless-steel plates connected to conventional steel plates. With a complete literature review, gaps in research can be identified to guide the Task 2 research effort of bolted and welded dual grade joints. Task 2 – Connection Testing & Verifying Design/Fabrication Details - 24 Months ($300,000) The Research Team proposes to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) of contributors a work plan for research to fill the gaps identified in Task 1. This will lead to mechanical property evaluation of complete joint penetration and fillet welds, along with bolted joints. Pending the findings from Task 1, the second task will include: Development of AASHTO/AWS D1.5 Bridge Welding Code Welding Procedure Specification(s) and a Procedure Qualification Record (PQR). Development of refined nondestructive evaluation procedures for dual grade welded joints. Assessment of dual grade welded joints to stress corrosion and galvanic corrosion Determining the appropriate grades of bolts to use in a dual grade joint to minimize or eliminate the effects of galvanic and pitting corrosion. Determining the appropriate grades of stainless bolts to use in dual grade joints that could achieve minimum installation pretension and the procedure to attain the minimum installation pretension. Determine if a dual grade bolted connection can attain slip-critical design loading. Phase 3 – Final Report & Guidelines - 6 Months ($50,000) Provide a final report that, at a minimum, provides: A summary of the literature review; Documented tests, test results, summaries, and conclusions from Task 2 activities; A cost analysis with recommendations to reduce dual grade girder connection costs; A cost analysis procedure tool for bridge designers; Guidelines covering the design details, fabrication, and installation of dual grade plate girders. The Research Team will also develop an educational program to instruct steel bridge fabricators on the proper procedures to weld conventional grade steel to stainless steels and qualified UT procedure meeting D1.5 requirements. Seeking 3 years @ $20,000 per year in funding.
SPR Part B Waiver has been approved. Research Need Sponsor: AASHTO T-14 Structural Steel Design Committee Seeking 3 years @ $20,000 per year in funding.
Subjects: Bridges, Other Structures, and Hydraulics and Hydrology
General Information |
|
Study Number: | TPF-5(493) |
Lead Organization: | North Carolina Department of Transportation |
Solicitation Number: | 1548 |
Partners: | DE, GADOT, LA, NC, NY, PADOT, TN |
Status: | Cleared by FHWA |
Est. Completion Date: | |
Contract/Other Number: | |
Last Updated: | Oct 14, 2024 |
Contract End Date: |
Financial Summary |
|
Contract Amount: | |
Total Commitments Received: | $420,000.00 |
100% SP&R Approval: |
Contact Information |
|||
Lead Study Contact(s): | Mustansir Kadibhai | ||
makadibhai@ncdot.gov | |||
Phone: 919 707 6667 | |||
FHWA Technical Liaison(s): | Justin Ocel | ||
justin.ocel@dot.gov | |||
Phone: 202- 281-8213 |
Organization | Year | Commitments | Technical Contact Name | Funding Contact Name | Contact Number | Email Address |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Delaware Department of Transportation | 2022 | $40,000.00 | Kevin Lindell | Charlanne Clymer | (302) 760-2704 | charlanne.clymer@delaware.gov |
Delaware Department of Transportation | 2023 | $20,000.00 | Kevin Lindell | Charlanne Clymer | (302) 760-2704 | charlanne.clymer@delaware.gov |
Georgia Department of Transportation | 2022 | $20,000.00 | Peter Wu | Brennan Roney | 404-347-0595 | broney@dot.ga.gov |
Georgia Department of Transportation | 2023 | $20,000.00 | Peter Wu | Brennan Roney | 404-347-0595 | broney@dot.ga.gov |
Georgia Department of Transportation | 2024 | $20,000.00 | Peter Wu | Brennan Roney | 404-347-0595 | broney@dot.ga.gov |
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development | 2021 | $20,000.00 | Kurt Brauner | Tyson Rupnow | tyson.rupnow@la.gov | |
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development | 2022 | $20,000.00 | Kurt Brauner | Tyson Rupnow | tyson.rupnow@la.gov | |
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development | 2023 | $20,000.00 | Kurt Brauner | Tyson Rupnow | tyson.rupnow@la.gov | |
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development | 2024 | $0.00 | Kurt Brauner | Tyson Rupnow | tyson.rupnow@la.gov | |
New York State Department of Transportation | 2021 | $0.00 | Jeffery Ward | Gail Carpenter | 518-457-8083 | Gail.Carpenter@dot.ny.gov |
New York State Department of Transportation | 2022 | $40,000.00 | Jeffery Ward | Gail Carpenter | 518-457-8083 | Gail.Carpenter@dot.ny.gov |
New York State Department of Transportation | 2023 | $20,000.00 | Jeffery Ward | Gail Carpenter | 518-457-8083 | Gail.Carpenter@dot.ny.gov |
North Carolina Department of Transportation | 2021 | $0.00 | Trey Carroll | Mustansir Kadibhai | 919 707 6667 | makadibhai@ncdot.gov |
North Carolina Department of Transportation | 2022 | $20,000.00 | Trey Carroll | Mustansir Kadibhai | 919 707 6667 | makadibhai@ncdot.gov |
North Carolina Department of Transportation | 2023 | $20,000.00 | Trey Carroll | Mustansir Kadibhai | 919 707 6667 | makadibhai@ncdot.gov |
North Carolina Department of Transportation | 2024 | $20,000.00 | Trey Carroll | Mustansir Kadibhai | 919 707 6667 | makadibhai@ncdot.gov |
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation | 2021 | $20,000.00 | Joshua Charnosky | Evan Zeiders | 717-787-8460 | evzeiders@pa.gov |
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation | 2022 | $20,000.00 | Joshua Charnosky | Evan Zeiders | 717-787-8460 | evzeiders@pa.gov |
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation | 2023 | $20,000.00 | Joshua Charnosky | Evan Zeiders | 717-787-8460 | evzeiders@pa.gov |
Tennessee Department of Transportation | 2021 | $20,000.00 | Rick Crawford | Stacy Carter | stacy.carter@tn.gov | |
Tennessee Department of Transportation | 2022 | $20,000.00 | Rick Crawford | Stacy Carter | stacy.carter@tn.gov | |
Tennessee Department of Transportation | 2023 | $20,000.00 | Rick Crawford | Stacy Carter | stacy.carter@tn.gov |
The corrosion of steel bridges is an ongoing concern for bridge owners due to maintenance and replacement costs. Recently, there have been successful corrosion resistance tests performed on ASTM A709 Grade 50CR (stainless) steel in plate girder bridges. Before stainless steel’s adoption into ASTM A709 the steel was marketed under ASTM A1010 and has currently been used in 5 states (OR, CA, IA, PA, VA) and Canada. Utilizing stainless steel (Grade 50CR) for the portion of the steel girder near bridge deck joints and Grade 50, 50W, etc. for the remainder of the girder, provides a means to mitigate deterioration in areas exposed to run-off from failed deck joints. Targeting the use of Grade 50CR to portions of the bridge requires bolting or welding stainless steel to conventional steel. The dual grade plate girder created by connecting stainless steel to conventional steel provides a reduction in the life cycle maintenance costs and increases the service life of the steel plate girder bridge. However, the connection of the dual grade plates may be prone to galvanic corrosion or require fabrication processes that differ from conventional plate girder fabrication processes. To take advantage of the corrosion resistant cost savings of a dual grade girder, research is needed to address the galvanic corrosion and fabrication of the dual grade connection.
The objective of this research is to examine the feasibility of connecting bridge-construction approved ASTM stainless steel (currently only Grade 50CR is approved) to conventional steel (Grade 36, 50, 50W, etc.) through welding or bolting and to develop guidelines to assist designers and fabricators when connecting stainless steel plates to conventional steel plates in the superstructure of highway bridges. The guidelines would be considered a supplemental document to the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications.
The proposed project is focused on the design details, fabrication, and performance of dual grade steel girders. The project’s work plan is divided into three main research tasks. Task 1 – Literature Review - 3 Months ($50,000) Conduct a current literature review of sources that have published mechanical and corrosion properties of stainless-steel plates connected to conventional steel plates. With a complete literature review, gaps in research can be identified to guide the Task 2 research effort of bolted and welded dual grade joints. Task 2 – Connection Testing & Verifying Design/Fabrication Details - 24 Months ($300,000) The Research Team proposes to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) of contributors a work plan for research to fill the gaps identified in Task 1. This will lead to mechanical property evaluation of complete joint penetration and fillet welds, along with bolted joints. Pending the findings from Task 1, the second task will include: Development of AASHTO/AWS D1.5 Bridge Welding Code Welding Procedure Specification(s) and a Procedure Qualification Record (PQR). Development of refined nondestructive evaluation procedures for dual grade welded joints. Assessment of dual grade welded joints to stress corrosion and galvanic corrosion Determining the appropriate grades of bolts to use in a dual grade joint to minimize or eliminate the effects of galvanic and pitting corrosion. Determining the appropriate grades of stainless bolts to use in dual grade joints that could achieve minimum installation pretension and the procedure to attain the minimum installation pretension. Determine if a dual grade bolted connection can attain slip-critical design loading. Phase 3 – Final Report & Guidelines - 6 Months ($50,000) Provide a final report that, at a minimum, provides: A summary of the literature review; Documented tests, test results, summaries, and conclusions from Task 2 activities; A cost analysis with recommendations to reduce dual grade girder connection costs; A cost analysis procedure tool for bridge designers; Guidelines covering the design details, fabrication, and installation of dual grade plate girders. The Research Team will also develop an educational program to instruct steel bridge fabricators on the proper procedures to weld conventional grade steel to stainless steels and qualified UT procedure meeting D1.5 requirements. Seeking 3 years @ $20,000 per year in funding.
SPR Part B Waiver has been approved. Research Need Sponsor: AASHTO T-14 Structural Steel Design Committee Seeking 3 years @ $20,000 per year in funding.
Subjects: Bridges, Other Structures, and Hydraulics and Hydrology
Title | File/Link | Type | Private |
---|---|---|---|
TPF-5(493) September 2024 Quarterly Progress Report | TPF-5-493_QuarterlyReport_September2024Q3_10-11-2024.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Investigation of Dual Grade / Hybrid Steel Plate Girders Utilizing Stainless Steel | TPF-5-493_QuarterlyReport_June2024Q2.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
TPF-5(493) March 2024 Quarterly Report | TPF-5-493_QuarterlyReport_March2024Q1_05-02-2024.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Acceptance Leter | TPF-5(493) Acceptance Letter - NCDOT.pdf | Memorandum | Public |
Title | File/Link | Type | Private |
---|---|---|---|
Approved Waiver Memo - Hybrid Plate Girder | Approval of SPR Waiver Pooled Fund Solicitation#1548.pdf | Memorandum | Public |
Hybrid Plate Girder Summary | Hybrid Plate Girder Research v4.1.pdf | TPF Study Documentation | Public |