Financial Summary |
|
Contract Amount: | $175,000.00 |
Suggested Contribution: | |
Total Commitments Received: | $250,000.00 |
100% SP&R Approval: | Approved |
Contact Information |
|||
Lead Study Contact(s): | -- -- | ||
Transfer.Research@iowadot.us | |||
Phone: -- | |||
Study Champion(s): | Tammy Bailey | ||
Tammy.Bailey@iowadot.us |
Organization | Year | Commitments | Technical Contact Name | Funding Contact Name |
---|---|---|---|---|
Connecticut Department of Transportation | 2005 | $8,000.00 | John Henault | James Sime |
Connecticut Department of Transportation | 2006 | $8,000.00 | John Henault | James Sime |
Connecticut Department of Transportation | 2007 | $9,000.00 | John Henault | James Sime |
Federal Highway Administration | 2004 | $100,000.00 | Suneel Vanikar | Sharon Smith |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2004 | $9,000.00 | Kevin Jones | -- -- |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2005 | $8,000.00 | Kevin Jones | -- -- |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2006 | $8,000.00 | Kevin Jones | -- -- |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2012 | $25,000.00 | Kevin Jones | -- -- |
Kansas Department of Transportation | 2005 | $25,000.00 | Dave Meggers | Rodney Montney |
New York State Department of Transportation | 2004 | $25,000.00 | Donald Streeter | Gary Frederick |
Ohio Department of Transportation | 2005 | $25,000.00 | Cynthia Jones | General Research |
Concrete containing slag generally exhibits excellent long-term strength and durability. However, several authors have expressed concern about the scaling resistance of concrete containing slag, especially when the dosage of slag exceeds 50% of the total cementitious material in the mixture (1-6). Much of the concern appears to be based on the results of laboratory scaling tests (most commonly ASTM C672) (7), which tend to be in poor agreement with field observations (2-6, 8-10). Others indicate that the test performs adequately for evaluating the relative scaling resistance of concrete specimens (11). A systematic study is needed to determine why this anomalous relationship exists between the scaling of field and laboratory concrete specimens containing slag. Ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS), referred to simply as ¿slag¿ in this document, has a long history of use with portland cement in concrete. Generally, slag improves many properties of both plastic and hardened concrete. The Transportation Research Board (TRB) Committee on Chemical Additions and Admixtures for Concrete summarizes the impact of slag on the properties of portland cement concrete (PCC) as listed in the table below (1). It is apparent that slag can make a significant contribution to the production of durable concrete products.
· Document the field performance of existing concrete pavements, bridge decks, and other structures made with slag cement that have been exposed to cyclical freeze-thaw cycles in the presence of deicing chemicals. · Determine from the field study and construction/design records which mixtures and construction parameters have produced scale-resistant concrete containing slag. · Determine the effectiveness of ASTM C672 in predicting the deicer scaling behavior of field concrete. If discrepancies are noted, an attempt will be made to explain why the lab tests do not adequately mimic field performance and alternative procedures will be recommended to improve the correlation between lab tests and field performance.
The project is proposed to be accomplished in two phases: Phase 1: - Document the field performance of existing concrete pavements, bridge decks, and other structures made with slag cement that have been exposed to cyclical freeze-thaw cycles in the presence of deicing chemicals. - Determine from the field study and construction/design records which mixtures and construction parameters have produced scale-resistant concrete containing slag. Phase 2: - Determine the effectiveness of ASTM C672 in predicting the deicer scaling behavior of field concrete. If discrepancies are noted, an attempt will be made to explain why the lab tests do not adequately mimic field performance and alternative procedures will be recommended to improve the correlation between lab tests and field performance. Note: Phase 1 of the project will be initiated once sufficient sponsorship is identified to enable expeditious execution of the research plan. Phase 2 sponsorship solicitation will continue concurrently with Phase 1 activity.
Phase I State DOTs* (3 @ $25,000) $75,000 Slag Cement Association* $100,000 Federal Highway Administration $100,000 Phase II: 7 states @ $25,000 = $175,000 Total Budget $450,000
Subjects: Maintenance Materials and Construction
Title | File/Link | Document Category | Document Type | Privacy | Document Date | Download |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPF-5(100) Closeout Funding Spreadsheet | TPF-5(100) Closeout Funding Spreadsheet.pdf | Other | Other | Public | 2015-04-23 | |
TPF-5(100) Closeout Letter | TPF-5(100) Closeout Letter - Signed.pdf | Memorandum | Other | Public | 2015-04-23 | |
Quarterly Report: June 2014 | TPF100_April-June2014.docx | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2014-07-31 | |
Technical Report on Setting Time Measurement: January 2014 | MDA_p-wave_w_cvr.pdf | TPF Study Documentation | Research Report | Public | 2014-07-29 | |
Quarterly Report: March 2014 | 5(100) QR March 2014.pdf | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2014-04-29 | |
Phase 3 Final Report January 2014 | 5(100) deicer_scaling_resistance.pdf | Deliverable | Final Report | Public | 2014-02-06 | |
Quarterly Report: Period Ending Dec 2013 | 5(100) QPR Dec 2013.docx | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2014-01-31 | |
Quarterly Report: September 2013 | TPF-5(100) Q3.pdf | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2013-11-04 | |
Phase 2 Report_Test Methods_July 2012 | deicer_scaling_w_cvr_July 2012.pdf | Deliverable | Final Report | Public | 2013-10-01 | |
Quarterly Report: June 2013 | TPF-5(100) 2013 Q2.pdf | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2013-07-24 | |
Quarterly Report: March 2013 | TPF5(100) QR March 2013.pdf | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2013-05-01 | |
Quarterly Report: December 2012 | 5(100)_Dec 2012 QR.pdf | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2013-01-31 | |
Quarterly Report: September 2012 | TPF-5(100) Sept 2012.pdf | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2012-10-26 | |
Acceptance Memo | 2012 slag cement acceptance memo.pdf | Memorandum | Other | Public | 2012-10-16 | |
Quarterly Report and Draft Final Report: June 2012 | June 2012 QPR_5(100).pdf | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2012-08-16 | |
Quarterly Report: March 2012 | 5(100)_FY12 qtr3.pdf | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2012-04-25 | |
Quarterly Report: December 2011 | 5(100)_Dec 2011 Quarterly Report.pdf | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2012-03-01 | |
Revised_Quarterly Report: July - Sept 2011_further explains schedule | 5(100)_Quarterly Report_July-Sept 2011_Revised.docx | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2011-12-07 | |
Void_Quarterly Report: July - September 2011 | TPF5100_Jul-Sept2011.docx | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2011-12-01 | |
Quarterly Report: April - June 2011 | TPF-5(100) Quarterly Report_Apr11 - Jun11.pdf | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2011-08-16 | |
Quarterly Report: January - March 2011 | TPF-5(100) Quarterly Report 3-31-11.pdf | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2011-06-13 | |
Quarterly Report: October - December 2010 | TPF5(100)DeicerScalingFY11qtr2.pdf | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2011-02-03 | |
Progress Report: July - September 2010 | TPF5(100)20103rdQ.pdf | Progress Report | Quarterly Progress Report | Public | 2010-12-07 | |
Phase 1 Final Report: Site Selection and Analysis of Cores. Sept 2008 | http://www.ctre.iastate.edu/reports/schlorholtz_deicing_phase1.pdf | Deliverable | Final Report | Public | 2009-02-10 |
General Information |
|
Study Number: | TPF-5(100) |
Lead Organization: | Iowa Department of Transportation |
Contract Start Date: | Jun 22, 2010 |
Solicitation Number: | 846 |
Partners: | CT, FHWA, IADOT, KS, NY, OH |
Contractor(s): | Iowa State University |
Status: | Closed |
Est. Completion Date: | Dec 25, 2013 |
Contract/Other Number: | |
Last Updated: | Apr 23, 2015 |
Contract End Date: | Mar 31, 2014 |
Financial Summary |
|
Contract Amount: | $175,000.00 |
Total Commitments Received: | $250,000.00 |
100% SP&R Approval: |
Contact Information |
|||
Lead Study Contact(s): | -- -- | ||
Transfer.Research@iowadot.us | |||
Phone: -- |
Organization | Year | Commitments | Technical Contact Name | Funding Contact Name | Contact Number | Email Address |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Connecticut Department of Transportation | 2005 | $8,000.00 | John Henault | James Sime | 860-258-0309 | james.sime@ct.gov |
Connecticut Department of Transportation | 2006 | $8,000.00 | John Henault | James Sime | 860-258-0309 | james.sime@ct.gov |
Connecticut Department of Transportation | 2007 | $9,000.00 | John Henault | James Sime | 860-258-0309 | james.sime@ct.gov |
Federal Highway Administration | 2004 | $100,000.00 | Suneel Vanikar | Sharon Smith | 202-366-1553 | sharon.r.smith@dot.gov |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2004 | $9,000.00 | Kevin Jones | -- -- | -- | Transfer.Research@iowadot.us |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2005 | $8,000.00 | Kevin Jones | -- -- | -- | Transfer.Research@iowadot.us |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2006 | $8,000.00 | Kevin Jones | -- -- | -- | Transfer.Research@iowadot.us |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2012 | $25,000.00 | Kevin Jones | -- -- | -- | Transfer.Research@iowadot.us |
Kansas Department of Transportation | 2005 | $25,000.00 | Dave Meggers | Rodney Montney | 785-291-3844 | rodney@ksdot.org |
New York State Department of Transportation | 2004 | $25,000.00 | Donald Streeter | Gary Frederick | 518-457-4645 | gary.frederick@dot.ny.gov |
Ohio Department of Transportation | 2005 | $25,000.00 | Cynthia Jones | General Research | 614-644-8135 | Research@dot.state.oh.us |
Concrete containing slag generally exhibits excellent long-term strength and durability. However, several authors have expressed concern about the scaling resistance of concrete containing slag, especially when the dosage of slag exceeds 50% of the total cementitious material in the mixture (1-6). Much of the concern appears to be based on the results of laboratory scaling tests (most commonly ASTM C672) (7), which tend to be in poor agreement with field observations (2-6, 8-10). Others indicate that the test performs adequately for evaluating the relative scaling resistance of concrete specimens (11). A systematic study is needed to determine why this anomalous relationship exists between the scaling of field and laboratory concrete specimens containing slag. Ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS), referred to simply as ¿slag¿ in this document, has a long history of use with portland cement in concrete. Generally, slag improves many properties of both plastic and hardened concrete. The Transportation Research Board (TRB) Committee on Chemical Additions and Admixtures for Concrete summarizes the impact of slag on the properties of portland cement concrete (PCC) as listed in the table below (1). It is apparent that slag can make a significant contribution to the production of durable concrete products.
· Document the field performance of existing concrete pavements, bridge decks, and other structures made with slag cement that have been exposed to cyclical freeze-thaw cycles in the presence of deicing chemicals. · Determine from the field study and construction/design records which mixtures and construction parameters have produced scale-resistant concrete containing slag. · Determine the effectiveness of ASTM C672 in predicting the deicer scaling behavior of field concrete. If discrepancies are noted, an attempt will be made to explain why the lab tests do not adequately mimic field performance and alternative procedures will be recommended to improve the correlation between lab tests and field performance.
The project is proposed to be accomplished in two phases: Phase 1: - Document the field performance of existing concrete pavements, bridge decks, and other structures made with slag cement that have been exposed to cyclical freeze-thaw cycles in the presence of deicing chemicals. - Determine from the field study and construction/design records which mixtures and construction parameters have produced scale-resistant concrete containing slag. Phase 2: - Determine the effectiveness of ASTM C672 in predicting the deicer scaling behavior of field concrete. If discrepancies are noted, an attempt will be made to explain why the lab tests do not adequately mimic field performance and alternative procedures will be recommended to improve the correlation between lab tests and field performance. Note: Phase 1 of the project will be initiated once sufficient sponsorship is identified to enable expeditious execution of the research plan. Phase 2 sponsorship solicitation will continue concurrently with Phase 1 activity.
Phase I State DOTs* (3 @ $25,000) $75,000 Slag Cement Association* $100,000 Federal Highway Administration $100,000 Phase II: 7 states @ $25,000 = $175,000 Total Budget $450,000
Subjects: Maintenance Materials and Construction
Title | File/Link | Type | Private |
---|---|---|---|
TPF-5(100) Closeout Funding Spreadsheet | TPF-5(100) Closeout Funding Spreadsheet.pdf | Other | Public |
TPF-5(100) Closeout Letter | TPF-5(100) Closeout Letter - Signed.pdf | Memorandum | Public |
Quarterly Report: June 2014 | TPF100_April-June2014.docx | Progress Report | Public |
Technical Report on Setting Time Measurement: January 2014 | MDA_p-wave_w_cvr.pdf | TPF Study Documentation | Public |
Quarterly Report: March 2014 | 5(100) QR March 2014.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Phase 3 Final Report January 2014 | 5(100) deicer_scaling_resistance.pdf | Deliverable | Public |
Quarterly Report: Period Ending Dec 2013 | 5(100) QPR Dec 2013.docx | Progress Report | Public |
Quarterly Report: September 2013 | TPF-5(100) Q3.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Phase 2 Report_Test Methods_July 2012 | deicer_scaling_w_cvr_July 2012.pdf | Deliverable | Public |
Quarterly Report: June 2013 | TPF-5(100) 2013 Q2.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Quarterly Report: March 2013 | TPF5(100) QR March 2013.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Quarterly Report: December 2012 | 5(100)_Dec 2012 QR.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Quarterly Report: September 2012 | TPF-5(100) Sept 2012.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Acceptance Memo | 2012 slag cement acceptance memo.pdf | Memorandum | Public |
Quarterly Report and Draft Final Report: June 2012 | June 2012 QPR_5(100).pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Quarterly Report: March 2012 | 5(100)_FY12 qtr3.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Quarterly Report: December 2011 | 5(100)_Dec 2011 Quarterly Report.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Revised_Quarterly Report: July - Sept 2011_further explains schedule | 5(100)_Quarterly Report_July-Sept 2011_Revised.docx | Progress Report | Public |
Void_Quarterly Report: July - September 2011 | TPF5100_Jul-Sept2011.docx | Progress Report | Public |
Quarterly Report: April - June 2011 | TPF-5(100) Quarterly Report_Apr11 - Jun11.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Quarterly Report: January - March 2011 | TPF-5(100) Quarterly Report 3-31-11.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Quarterly Report: October - December 2010 | TPF5(100)DeicerScalingFY11qtr2.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Progress Report: July - September 2010 | TPF5(100)20103rdQ.pdf | Progress Report | Public |
Phase 1 Final Report: Site Selection and Analysis of Cores. Sept 2008 | Deliverable | Public |
Title | File/Link | Type | Private |
---|---|---|---|
Deicer Scaling Resistance of Concrete Pavements, Bridge Decks and Other Structures Containing Slag Cement | 846.pdf | TPF Study Documentation | Public |