Financial Summary |
|
Suggested Contribution: | |
Commitment Start Year: | |
Commitment End Year: | 1999 |
100% SP&R Approval: | Not Requested |
Commitments Required: | |
Commitments Received: | |
Estimated Duration Month: | |
Waiver Requested: | No |
Contact Information |
|
Lead Study Contact(s): | Jean Landolt |
Jean.Landolt@dot.gov | |
FHWA Technical Liaison(s): | Kevin Stuart |
Organization | Year | Commitments | Technical Contact Name | Funding Contact Name | Contact Number | Email Address |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arkansas Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
California Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Connecticut Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Florida Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Georgia Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Illinois Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | Tom Zehr | Megan Swanson | 217-782-3547 | Megan.Swanson@illinois.gov |
Indiana Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Iowa Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | Scott Schram | Linda Narigon | Linda.Narigon@iowadot.us | |
Kansas Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Construction | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Michigan Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Minnesota Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Nebraska Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
New Jersey Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
North Carolina Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
North Dakota Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Ohio Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Oklahoma Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Oregon Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
South Carolina Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Texas Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Virginia Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Washington State Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Wisconsin Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 |
Phase I ? Evaluate the sensitivities of tests used to measure the rutting resistance of an asphalt paving mixture, to changes in three material properties: (1) voids in the mineral aggregate, (2) fine aggregate angularity, and (3) aggregate gradation. Four tests were evaluated: (1) a full-scale accelerated pavement tester, (2) a laboratory wheel-tracking test called the PurWheel, (3) a triaxial compression test, and (4) the Superpave Shear Tester. Phase II ? Expansion of Phase I. The properties of the materials tested in Phase I were varied widely in order to evaluate the pavement and laboratory mixture tests. The best tests were then to be used in Phase II. Under Phase II, the number and types of materials were expanded to determine how the three material properties affect rutting performance.
Study is complete. Awaiting the final report, expected in March 2002.
No document attached.
General Information |
|
Solicitation Number: | 83 |
Status: | End Solicitation Phase |
Date Posted: | Jul 01, 2002 |
Last Updated: | Apr 09, 2013 |
Solicitation Expires: | |
Partners: | AR, CA, CT, FL, GADOT, IADOT, IL, IN, KS, MA, MI, MN, NC, ND, NE, NJ, OH, OK, OR, PADOT, SC, TX, VA, WA, WI |
Lead Organization: | Federal Highway Administration |
Financial Summary |
|
Suggested Contribution: | |
Commitment Start Year: | |
Commitment End Year: | 1999 |
100% SP&R Approval: | Not Requested |
Commitments Required: | |
Commitments Received: |
Contact Information |
|
Lead Study Contact(s): | Jean Landolt |
Jean.Landolt@dot.gov | |
FHWA Technical Liaison(s): | Kevin Stuart |
Agency | Year | Commitments | Technical Contact Name | Funding Contact Name | Contact Number | Email Address |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arkansas Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
California Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Connecticut Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Florida Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Georgia Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Illinois Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | Tom Zehr | Megan Swanson | 217-782-3547 | Megan.Swanson@illinois.gov |
Indiana Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Iowa Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | Scott Schram | Linda Narigon | Linda.Narigon@iowadot.us | |
Kansas Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Construction | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Michigan Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Minnesota Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Nebraska Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
New Jersey Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
North Carolina Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
North Dakota Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Ohio Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Oklahoma Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Oregon Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
South Carolina Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Texas Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Virginia Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Washington State Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 | ||||
Wisconsin Department of Transportation | 1997 | $0.00 |
Phase I ? Evaluate the sensitivities of tests used to measure the rutting resistance of an asphalt paving mixture, to changes in three material properties: (1) voids in the mineral aggregate, (2) fine aggregate angularity, and (3) aggregate gradation. Four tests were evaluated: (1) a full-scale accelerated pavement tester, (2) a laboratory wheel-tracking test called the PurWheel, (3) a triaxial compression test, and (4) the Superpave Shear Tester. Phase II ? Expansion of Phase I. The properties of the materials tested in Phase I were varied widely in order to evaluate the pavement and laboratory mixture tests. The best tests were then to be used in Phase II. Under Phase II, the number and types of materials were expanded to determine how the three material properties affect rutting performance.
Study is complete. Awaiting the final report, expected in March 2002.