General Information |
|
| Solicitation Number: | 1668 |
| Former Study Number: | TPF-5(503) |
| Status: | Solicitation posted |
| Date Posted: | Sep 04, 2026 |
| Last Updated: | Sep 04, 2026 |
| Solicitation Expires: | Sep 04, 2027 |
| Partners: | KS |
| Lead Organization: | Kansas Department of Transportation |
Financial Summary |
|
| Suggested Yearly Contribution: | $45,000.00 |
| Commitment Start Year: | 2027 |
| Commitment End Year: | 2031 |
| 100% SP&R Approval: | Not Requested |
| Commitments Required: | $1,800,000.00 |
| Commitments Received: | $180,000.00 |
| Estimated Duration Month: | 48 |
| Waiver Requested: | Yes |
Contact Information |
|
| Lead Study Contact(s): | David Behzadpour |
| David.Behzadpour@ks.gov | |
| Study Champion(s): | Dan Wadley |
| Dan.Wadley@ks.gov | |
| Phone: 785-291-3845 | |
| Organization | Year | Commitments | Technical Contact Name | Funding Contact Name | Contact Number | Email Address |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas Department of Transportation | 2027 | $45,000.00 | Dan Wadley | David Behzadpour | 785-291-3847 | David.Behzadpour@ks.gov |
| Kansas Department of Transportation | 2028 | $45,000.00 | Dan Wadley | David Behzadpour | 785-291-3847 | David.Behzadpour@ks.gov |
| Kansas Department of Transportation | 2029 | $45,000.00 | Dan Wadley | David Behzadpour | 785-291-3847 | David.Behzadpour@ks.gov |
| Kansas Department of Transportation | 2030 | $45,000.00 | Dan Wadley | David Behzadpour | 785-291-3847 | David.Behzadpour@ks.gov |
|
Rigid inclusions (RIs) are rigid columns,
which can be different materials and installed by different installation
methods, and are often used with load transfer platforms (LTPs) to support
embankments, retaining walls, and box culverts for transportation
applications. The Phase I study performed comprehensive literature review,
evaluation of existing design methods, and assessment of available
construction specifications. The final report of this study is available at: Phase I study. This study has revealed several knowledge gaps and limitations in
current practices. These gaps include missing data, inadequate procedures,
and insufficient consideration of key factors as summarized here: (1) The
common analytical methods in codes or reference manuals are not accurate or
reliable enough to predict the performance of RI-supported
embankments/structures over soft subsoils for transportation projects; (2) Limited
analysis methods are available in codes or reference manuals to evaluate the
stability of RI-supported embankments over soft subsoils (except for the
numerical method with actual RI layout and properties, all current methods
overestimated the factor of safety; (3) No field data is available to verify
the accuracy of analysis methods for RI-supported embankment stability; (4) Limited
field data shows RI installation effects on surrounding soils, RIs, and
structures; (5) No field data is available to evaluate lateral capacities of
RIs, and no detailed guidance is available for steel rebars in RIs; (6) No
field data is available to compare the behavior of RIs under walls versus
embankments; (7) No field data is available to evaluate the relevance of a
single RI load test with group RIs under embankments; and (8) No consistent
specification is available for installing RIs, QC/QA, and
instrumentation/monitoring during construction and for long-term performance. |
The main objective of the Phase II research
is to address the knowledge gaps identified in the Phase I study to improve
reliability, performance, and safety of transportation infrastructure (e.g., embankments/structures)
supported by RIs. The detailed
objectives include: (1) gathering full-scale test data for RI serviceability
and failure limits, (2) improving analytical methods for load and deformation
calculations, (3) evaluating installation-induced soil displacements and
potential damage to adjacent RIs and structures as well as soil property
changes, (4) evaluating load-displacement behavior of single RI versus group
RIs under walls/embankments, (5) investigating RI behavior under walls versus
slopes, (6) evaluating lateral load capacities of RIs with and without steel
rebars, (7) improving/developing an analytical method for slope stability with
RIs, and (8) developing guidelines for construction specifications and
instrumentation.
|
|
This Phase
II project is comprised of seven major tasks:
Based on the findings from the Phase I study, a
full-scale field test program will be developed to fill the gaps of knowledge
and practice identified and collect additional data to be used for validating
and improving existing design methods or developing new design methods. A test
site has been tentatively selected in Lawrence, Kansas and existing
geotechnical information for the test site has been collected.
Task 2: Performing Additional Site Characterization
Additional insitu and laboratory tests will be
performed on the selected test site to better determine geotechnical
engineering profiles and quantify soil and rock properties. Embankment fill
Task 3: Constructing Test Embankment and Quantifying
Installation Effects
Conduct field tests to evaluate installation
effects of rigid inclusions by the drilled displacement method. The evaluation will
include, but is not limited to, ground movements and excess pore water
pressures at different distances and depths, changes in soil properties (e.g.,
density, strength, and modulus) with two different rigid inclusion spacings and
installation sequences.
Task 4: Evaluating
Load-Displacement Responses of RIs
Perform field loading tests on RIs without and
with steel reinforcements under vertical and lateral loads to evaluate the
load-displacement responses of RIs and the effect of steel reinforcements in
RIs.
Task 5: Assessing Global Performance
Construct a 20-ft high full-scale test
embankment (consisting of a vertical wall on one side and a steep slope on
another side) with a geosynthetic-reinforced load transfer platform on
installed RIs. The test embankment, the load transfer platform, and selected RIs
will be instrumented with sensors and monitored to evaluate the global
performance including load transfer (e.g., load distribution between RIs and
soils, downdrag forces, and tensile forces in geosynthetics), differential
settlements between RIs and soils, lateral displacements of RIs and soils, and
stability of side slope/wall. Numerical analyses will be performed to
supplement the full-scale experimental program.
Task 6: Standardizing Design Approach
Based on the results from the installation effect study
in Task 3, the RI loading tests in Task 4, and the full-scale field testing and
the numerical analyses in Task 5, the design methods identified in the Phase I
study will be validated and improved so that they can be standardized for the
design and evaluation of RIs for transportation infrastructure projects.
Task 7: Developing Construction and Instrumentation Specifications
Develop a specification for implementing RIs in transportation
infrastructure projects, especially for embankment and retaining wall support
and guidance (performance-based) specifications that provide the DOTs (along
with FHWA and NHI) a means to perform quality assurance (e.g., inspection and
testing) and instrumentation during and after construction.
At the conclusion of this project, three deliverables will
be produced:
i.
A new, standardized design method or
new recommended factors and input values that account for soil conditions,
installation technique, and installation effects to be included into design
computations for nominal axial, lateral, and flexural resistance of single and
grouped RIs.
ii.
Guidance (performance-based)
specifications that provide the DOTs (along with FHWA and NHI) a means to
perform quality assurance (e.g., inspection and testing) and to evaluate the
findings therefrom. The guidance specifications will be developed such that
they would apply, be common, and be applicable to the various construction
methods used to install RIs.
iii. The report will provide recommendations and guidance for incorporation into (a) AASHTO bridge specifications, (b) state DOT project specifications, (c) future updates of FHWA guidance documents (e.g., GEC-8 and GEC-13), and (d) applicable NHI training courses.
The required commitment for the
Phase II study is $1,800,000. Participants are requested to contribute $45,000/year
for four years from each state.
Contractors may provide in-kind contributions to
install rigid inclusions in the field.
Subjects: Bridges, Other Structures, and Hydraulics and Hydrology
No document attached.
General Information |
|
| Solicitation Number: | 1668 |
| Status: | Solicitation posted |
| Date Posted: | Sep 04, 2026 |
| Last Updated: | Sep 04, 2026 |
| Solicitation Expires: | Sep 04, 2027 |
| Partners: | KS |
| Lead Organization: | Kansas Department of Transportation |
Financial Summary |
|
| Suggested Yearly Contribution: | $45,000.00 |
| Commitment Start Year: | 2027 |
| Commitment End Year: | 2031 |
| 100% SP&R Approval: | Not Requested |
| Commitments Required: | $1,800,000.00 |
| Commitments Received: | $180,000.00 |
Contact Information |
|
| Lead Study Contact(s): | David Behzadpour |
| David.Behzadpour@ks.gov | |
| Agency | Year | Commitments | Technical Contact Name | Funding Contact Name | Contact Number | Email Address |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas Department of Transportation | 2027 | $45,000.00 | Dan Wadley | David Behzadpour | 785-291-3847 | David.Behzadpour@ks.gov |
| Kansas Department of Transportation | 2028 | $45,000.00 | Dan Wadley | David Behzadpour | 785-291-3847 | David.Behzadpour@ks.gov |
| Kansas Department of Transportation | 2029 | $45,000.00 | Dan Wadley | David Behzadpour | 785-291-3847 | David.Behzadpour@ks.gov |
| Kansas Department of Transportation | 2030 | $45,000.00 | Dan Wadley | David Behzadpour | 785-291-3847 | David.Behzadpour@ks.gov |
|
Rigid inclusions (RIs) are rigid columns,
which can be different materials and installed by different installation
methods, and are often used with load transfer platforms (LTPs) to support
embankments, retaining walls, and box culverts for transportation
applications. The Phase I study performed comprehensive literature review,
evaluation of existing design methods, and assessment of available
construction specifications. The final report of this study is available at: Phase I study. This study has revealed several knowledge gaps and limitations in
current practices. These gaps include missing data, inadequate procedures,
and insufficient consideration of key factors as summarized here: (1) The
common analytical methods in codes or reference manuals are not accurate or
reliable enough to predict the performance of RI-supported
embankments/structures over soft subsoils for transportation projects; (2) Limited
analysis methods are available in codes or reference manuals to evaluate the
stability of RI-supported embankments over soft subsoils (except for the
numerical method with actual RI layout and properties, all current methods
overestimated the factor of safety; (3) No field data is available to verify
the accuracy of analysis methods for RI-supported embankment stability; (4) Limited
field data shows RI installation effects on surrounding soils, RIs, and
structures; (5) No field data is available to evaluate lateral capacities of
RIs, and no detailed guidance is available for steel rebars in RIs; (6) No
field data is available to compare the behavior of RIs under walls versus
embankments; (7) No field data is available to evaluate the relevance of a
single RI load test with group RIs under embankments; and (8) No consistent
specification is available for installing RIs, QC/QA, and
instrumentation/monitoring during construction and for long-term performance. |
The main objective of the Phase II research
is to address the knowledge gaps identified in the Phase I study to improve
reliability, performance, and safety of transportation infrastructure (e.g., embankments/structures)
supported by RIs. The detailed
objectives include: (1) gathering full-scale test data for RI serviceability
and failure limits, (2) improving analytical methods for load and deformation
calculations, (3) evaluating installation-induced soil displacements and
potential damage to adjacent RIs and structures as well as soil property
changes, (4) evaluating load-displacement behavior of single RI versus group
RIs under walls/embankments, (5) investigating RI behavior under walls versus
slopes, (6) evaluating lateral load capacities of RIs with and without steel
rebars, (7) improving/developing an analytical method for slope stability with
RIs, and (8) developing guidelines for construction specifications and
instrumentation.
|
|
This Phase
II project is comprised of seven major tasks:
Based on the findings from the Phase I study, a
full-scale field test program will be developed to fill the gaps of knowledge
and practice identified and collect additional data to be used for validating
and improving existing design methods or developing new design methods. A test
site has been tentatively selected in Lawrence, Kansas and existing
geotechnical information for the test site has been collected.
Task 2: Performing Additional Site Characterization
Additional insitu and laboratory tests will be
performed on the selected test site to better determine geotechnical
engineering profiles and quantify soil and rock properties. Embankment fill
Task 3: Constructing Test Embankment and Quantifying
Installation Effects
Conduct field tests to evaluate installation
effects of rigid inclusions by the drilled displacement method. The evaluation will
include, but is not limited to, ground movements and excess pore water
pressures at different distances and depths, changes in soil properties (e.g.,
density, strength, and modulus) with two different rigid inclusion spacings and
installation sequences.
Task 4: Evaluating
Load-Displacement Responses of RIs
Perform field loading tests on RIs without and
with steel reinforcements under vertical and lateral loads to evaluate the
load-displacement responses of RIs and the effect of steel reinforcements in
RIs.
Task 5: Assessing Global Performance
Construct a 20-ft high full-scale test
embankment (consisting of a vertical wall on one side and a steep slope on
another side) with a geosynthetic-reinforced load transfer platform on
installed RIs. The test embankment, the load transfer platform, and selected RIs
will be instrumented with sensors and monitored to evaluate the global
performance including load transfer (e.g., load distribution between RIs and
soils, downdrag forces, and tensile forces in geosynthetics), differential
settlements between RIs and soils, lateral displacements of RIs and soils, and
stability of side slope/wall. Numerical analyses will be performed to
supplement the full-scale experimental program.
Task 6: Standardizing Design Approach
Based on the results from the installation effect study
in Task 3, the RI loading tests in Task 4, and the full-scale field testing and
the numerical analyses in Task 5, the design methods identified in the Phase I
study will be validated and improved so that they can be standardized for the
design and evaluation of RIs for transportation infrastructure projects.
Task 7: Developing Construction and Instrumentation Specifications
Develop a specification for implementing RIs in transportation
infrastructure projects, especially for embankment and retaining wall support
and guidance (performance-based) specifications that provide the DOTs (along
with FHWA and NHI) a means to perform quality assurance (e.g., inspection and
testing) and instrumentation during and after construction.
At the conclusion of this project, three deliverables will
be produced:
i.
A new, standardized design method or
new recommended factors and input values that account for soil conditions,
installation technique, and installation effects to be included into design
computations for nominal axial, lateral, and flexural resistance of single and
grouped RIs.
ii.
Guidance (performance-based)
specifications that provide the DOTs (along with FHWA and NHI) a means to
perform quality assurance (e.g., inspection and testing) and to evaluate the
findings therefrom. The guidance specifications will be developed such that
they would apply, be common, and be applicable to the various construction
methods used to install RIs.
iii. The report will provide recommendations and guidance for incorporation into (a) AASHTO bridge specifications, (b) state DOT project specifications, (c) future updates of FHWA guidance documents (e.g., GEC-8 and GEC-13), and (d) applicable NHI training courses.
The required commitment for the
Phase II study is $1,800,000. Participants are requested to contribute $45,000/year
for four years from each state.
Contractors may provide in-kind contributions to
install rigid inclusions in the field.
Subjects: Bridges, Other Structures, and Hydraulics and Hydrology