Financial Summary |
|
Suggested Contribution: | $150,000.00 |
Commitment Start Year: | 2026 |
Commitment End Year: | 2030 |
100% SP&R Approval: | Approved |
Commitments Required: | $1,500,000.00 |
Commitments Received: | $300,000.00 |
Estimated Duration Month: | 60 |
Waiver Requested: | Yes |
Contact Information |
|
Lead Study Contact(s): | Khyle Clute |
Khyle.Clute@iowadot.us | |
FHWA Technical Liaison(s): | Jennifer Nicks |
jennifer.nicks@dot.gov | |
Phone: 202- 493-3075 | |
Study Champion(s): | Chris Brakke |
chris.brakke@iowadot.us |
Organization | Year | Commitments | Technical Contact Name | Funding Contact Name | Contact Number | Email Address |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2026 | $30,000.00 | Chris Brakke | -- -- | -- | Transfer.Research@iowadot.us |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2027 | $30,000.00 | Chris Brakke | -- -- | -- | Transfer.Research@iowadot.us |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2028 | $30,000.00 | Chris Brakke | -- -- | -- | Transfer.Research@iowadot.us |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2029 | $30,000.00 | Chris Brakke | -- -- | -- | Transfer.Research@iowadot.us |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2030 | $30,000.00 | Chris Brakke | -- -- | -- | Transfer.Research@iowadot.us |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2026 | $30,000.00 | Jacob Graessle | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2027 | $30,000.00 | Jacob Graessle | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2028 | $30,000.00 | Jacob Graessle | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2029 | $30,000.00 | Jacob Graessle | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2030 | $30,000.00 | Jacob Graessle | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Long-life pavement systems (pavement layer, subbase layer,
and subgrade foundation) have not been achieved by most SHAs due to:
1)
failure to design the pavement and foundation
materials as an interrelated system whereby the foundation materials are
designed to meet the pavement design requirements,
2)
lack of a modern pavement foundation design
methodology that enables the foundation layers to be engineered for optimal
performance considering material selection, layer thicknesses, pavement design
requirements, construction practices, cost, and durability
of as-constructed layers,
3)
lack of meaningful quality assurance (QA) sampling
and measurement for field verification of as-constructed pavement foundation support
leading to paving over deficient and/or un optimized foundations,
4)
inadequate understanding of how pavement and foundation materials can be optimized and constructed without compromising long-term performance,
5)
lack of established engineering relationships
between current indirectly measured acceptance criteria and performance, thus
creating a barrier to continuous specification price adjustment provisions that
are needed to incentivize quality material selection and construction.
Although advancements in pavement layer design tools and
software have emerged over the last few decades, practices for the design,
construction quality control, and quality assurance verification of the
pavement foundation materials (subbase, subgrade, embankment) have not advanced
resulting in most pavement foundations being specified, not engineered, and not
verified prior to paving. Further, the
current practice of using (legacy) specified pavement foundation
materials/thicknesses often results in reliance on thick pavements with
relatively thin, variable, unoptimized foundation layers subject to deformation
over time. Advancement in pavement foundation design and construction practices
is critical to achieving long-life pavement systems.
Main study objectives include:
1) Provide
technical support to SHAs for building long-life pavement systems pilot projects
using optimized pavement and foundation design solutions that achieve the
design assumptions for the foundation materials, including developing a Quality
Assurance Program (QA) that addressed field performance verification
measurements during construction. Technical support elements include:
a.
Determine, on statewide basis (representative
materials), if the design values are being achieved using spot plate load
tests. The test results will be used to populate a database for each SHA with
results of what is being achieved for various foundation materials with current
specifications compared to design assumptions. This data is strategic in
understanding where there is opportunity to significantly improve pavement
performance and optimize designs.
b.
Determine, at project level, if the construction
quality verification is delivering design modulus and verify with 100% mapping.
c.
Establish a process for QA in compliance with 23 CFR
Part 637, Subpart B (Quality Assurance Procedures for Construction) and provide
technical assistance to SHA.
d.
Develop draft specifications that incentivize
quality the foundation layers.
2) Develop
the methodology for a modern pavement foundation design.
Proposed project activities include:
Funding:
Technical Representative Duties:
New Members:
Subjects: Maintenance Materials and Construction Pavement Design, Management, and Performance Soils, Geology, and Foundations
General Information |
|
Solicitation Number: | 1632 |
Status: | Solicitation posted |
Date Posted: | Jan 03, 2025 |
Last Updated: | Feb 20, 2025 |
Solicitation Expires: | Jan 03, 2026 |
Partners: | IADOT, MO |
Lead Organization: | Iowa Department of Transportation |
Financial Summary |
|
Suggested Contribution: | $150,000.00 |
Commitment Start Year: | 2026 |
Commitment End Year: | 2030 |
100% SP&R Approval: | Approved |
Commitments Required: | $1,500,000.00 |
Commitments Received: | $300,000.00 |
Contact Information |
|
Lead Study Contact(s): | Khyle Clute |
Khyle.Clute@iowadot.us | |
FHWA Technical Liaison(s): | Jennifer Nicks |
jennifer.nicks@dot.gov | |
Phone: 202- 493-3075 |
Agency | Year | Commitments | Technical Contact Name | Funding Contact Name | Contact Number | Email Address |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2026 | $30,000.00 | Chris Brakke | -- -- | -- | Transfer.Research@iowadot.us |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2027 | $30,000.00 | Chris Brakke | -- -- | -- | Transfer.Research@iowadot.us |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2028 | $30,000.00 | Chris Brakke | -- -- | -- | Transfer.Research@iowadot.us |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2029 | $30,000.00 | Chris Brakke | -- -- | -- | Transfer.Research@iowadot.us |
Iowa Department of Transportation | 2030 | $30,000.00 | Chris Brakke | -- -- | -- | Transfer.Research@iowadot.us |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2026 | $30,000.00 | Jacob Graessle | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2027 | $30,000.00 | Jacob Graessle | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2028 | $30,000.00 | Jacob Graessle | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2029 | $30,000.00 | Jacob Graessle | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Missouri Department of Transportation | 2030 | $30,000.00 | Jacob Graessle | Jennifer Harper | 573-526-3636 | Jennifer.Harper@modot.mo.gov |
Long-life pavement systems (pavement layer, subbase layer,
and subgrade foundation) have not been achieved by most SHAs due to:
1)
failure to design the pavement and foundation
materials as an interrelated system whereby the foundation materials are
designed to meet the pavement design requirements,
2)
lack of a modern pavement foundation design
methodology that enables the foundation layers to be engineered for optimal
performance considering material selection, layer thicknesses, pavement design
requirements, construction practices, cost, and durability
of as-constructed layers,
3)
lack of meaningful quality assurance (QA) sampling
and measurement for field verification of as-constructed pavement foundation support
leading to paving over deficient and/or un optimized foundations,
4)
inadequate understanding of how pavement and foundation materials can be optimized and constructed without compromising long-term performance,
5)
lack of established engineering relationships
between current indirectly measured acceptance criteria and performance, thus
creating a barrier to continuous specification price adjustment provisions that
are needed to incentivize quality material selection and construction.
Although advancements in pavement layer design tools and
software have emerged over the last few decades, practices for the design,
construction quality control, and quality assurance verification of the
pavement foundation materials (subbase, subgrade, embankment) have not advanced
resulting in most pavement foundations being specified, not engineered, and not
verified prior to paving. Further, the
current practice of using (legacy) specified pavement foundation
materials/thicknesses often results in reliance on thick pavements with
relatively thin, variable, unoptimized foundation layers subject to deformation
over time. Advancement in pavement foundation design and construction practices
is critical to achieving long-life pavement systems.
Main study objectives include:
1) Provide
technical support to SHAs for building long-life pavement systems pilot projects
using optimized pavement and foundation design solutions that achieve the
design assumptions for the foundation materials, including developing a Quality
Assurance Program (QA) that addressed field performance verification
measurements during construction. Technical support elements include:
a.
Determine, on statewide basis (representative
materials), if the design values are being achieved using spot plate load
tests. The test results will be used to populate a database for each SHA with
results of what is being achieved for various foundation materials with current
specifications compared to design assumptions. This data is strategic in
understanding where there is opportunity to significantly improve pavement
performance and optimize designs.
b.
Determine, at project level, if the construction
quality verification is delivering design modulus and verify with 100% mapping.
c.
Establish a process for QA in compliance with 23 CFR
Part 637, Subpart B (Quality Assurance Procedures for Construction) and provide
technical assistance to SHA.
d.
Develop draft specifications that incentivize
quality the foundation layers.
2) Develop
the methodology for a modern pavement foundation design.
Proposed project activities include:
Funding:
Technical Representative Duties:
New Members:
Subjects: Maintenance Materials and Construction Pavement Design, Management, and Performance Soils, Geology, and Foundations
Title | Type | Private |
---|---|---|
SPR Match Waiver | Memorandum | N |